From jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de Sun Apr 18 15:19:14 2010 From: jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de (Jean-Michel Bruenn) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:19:14 +0200 Subject: test Message-ID: <4BCB06D2.3010600@ip-minds.de> Just a test whether i can still write to the dev list. Ignore that mail. From jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de Mon Apr 19 11:55:14 2010 From: jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de (Jean-Michel Bruenn) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:55:14 +0200 Subject: Removal of 2.4 based stuff in Lunar - Question(s) Message-ID: <4BCC2882.8070801@ip-minds.de> Dear Developers, while Ratler and i want to modify an init script (mount) to perform better and to simplify it more we came to all the compatibility code for 2.4 based Kernels. As we would both like to discontinue 2.4 based Kernels in Lunar Linux we're coming to the obvious Questions: 1. Anyone against removal of 2.4 related things? 2. Anyone still "needing" (implements using) 2.4. related things? Please let us know soon. I also wrote an eMail to the normal Maillinglist, asking whether someone is still using 2.4 based Lunar systems. Cheers Jean-Michel Bruenn From zmcgrew at gmail.com Tue Apr 20 09:10:56 2010 From: zmcgrew at gmail.com (Zachary McGrew) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:10:56 -0700 Subject: Removal of 2.4 based stuff in Lunar - Question(s) In-Reply-To: <4BCC2882.8070801@ip-minds.de> References: <4BCC2882.8070801@ip-minds.de> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Jean-Michel Bruenn wrote: > ? ?1. Anyone against removal of 2.4 related things? Nope. It's time to move on. =) -- Zachary McGrew Web: http://zmcgrew.no-ip.com