From zbiggy at o2.pl Tue Jun 2 22:00:55 2009 From: zbiggy at o2.pl (Zbigniew Luszpinski) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:00:55 +0200 Subject: it looks distrowatch changed module list - lunar's page became complete mess Message-ID: <200906022200.56098.zbiggy@o2.pl> Hello, it looks distrowatch changed module list (some modules were added/removed). Almost every module version is out of sync with module name on Lunar's distrowatch page. Example: avidemux was added so since this module name all rows should go one row lower to match module name with correct version. This is only an example - there are more changes. If Lunar's distrowatch script maintainer is interested in updating the script I can help by finding what was added/removed. have a nice day, Zbigniew 'zbiggy' Luszpinski From ratler at lunar-linux.org Thu Jun 4 15:45:29 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:45:29 +0200 Subject: it looks distrowatch changed module list - lunar's page became complete mess In-Reply-To: <200906022200.56098.zbiggy@o2.pl> References: <200906022200.56098.zbiggy@o2.pl> Message-ID: <1244123129.12529.14.camel@localhost> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 22:00 +0200, Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote: > Hello, > > it looks distrowatch changed module list (some modules were added/removed). > Almost every module version is out of sync with module name on Lunar's > distrowatch page. > It's now been taken care of. distrowatch.com seem to be working properly again. -- Sincerely Stefan Wold Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ratler at lunar-linux.org Sat Jun 6 12:25:46 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:25:46 +0200 Subject: Lunar core tool repository change, svn -> git Message-ID: <1244283946.4480.8.camel@localhost> Hey, I've just converted our lunar core tools repository to git. Access to the old svn repository have as of now been revoked. Feel free to test it so that it work as intended. Scripts for generating theedge.tar.bz2 and lunar.tar.bz2 have been fixed, however lunar.tar.bz2 will be disabled for a couple of hours. I need to merge some stuff between master and the stable branch before I enable it. All developers who earlier had commit access to the core tools should still have that to the new git repo. Public: git://lunar-linux.org/lunar/lunar.git SSH: ssh://lunar-linux.org/var/git/lunar/lunar.git -- Sincerely Stefan Wold Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From tpchan at comcast.net Sat Jun 6 15:33:08 2009 From: tpchan at comcast.net (Terry Chan) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 08:33:08 -0500 Subject: Lunar core tool repository change, svn -> git In-Reply-To: <1244283946.4480.8.camel@localhost> References: <1244283946.4480.8.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <20090606133308.GA10828@sega.hsd1.il.comcast.net> Stefan, I modified on doppio the lunar-core group to add myself and remove xoritor. I've always had access to lunar/theedge svn. I don't think we need access for xoritor as he is not an active dev any longer. We could probably remove some of the other non-active devs as well. git clone worked for me. I also pushed a minor edit to the README file as a test commit, and that now works, once I fixed lunar-core group :) So where is "theedge" located now or is lunar == theedge again ? Is there going to be a "theedge" branch or what ? Terry Chan --------------------------------------------------------- On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Stefan Wold wrote: > Hey, > > I've just converted our lunar core tools repository to git. Access to > the old svn repository have as of now been revoked. Feel free to test it > so that it work as intended. Scripts for generating theedge.tar.bz2 and > lunar.tar.bz2 have been fixed, however lunar.tar.bz2 will be disabled > for a couple of hours. I need to merge some stuff between master and the > stable branch before I enable it. All developers who earlier had commit > access to the core tools should still have that to the new git repo. > > Public: git://lunar-linux.org/lunar/lunar.git > SSH: ssh://lunar-linux.org/var/git/lunar/lunar.git > > -- > Sincerely > Stefan Wold > Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 From ratler at lunar-linux.org Sat Jun 6 15:48:46 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:48:46 +0200 Subject: Lunar core tool repository change, svn -> git In-Reply-To: <20090606133308.GA10828@sega.hsd1.il.comcast.net> References: <1244283946.4480.8.camel@localhost> <20090606133308.GA10828@sega.hsd1.il.comcast.net> Message-ID: <1244296126.4480.12.camel@localhost> On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 08:33 -0500, Terry Chan wrote: > Stefan, > > I modified on doppio the lunar-core group to add myself and remove xoritor. > I've always had access to lunar/theedge svn. I don't think we need access for > xoritor as he is not an active dev any longer. We could probably remove some of > the other non-active devs as well. Yea I noticed there were several inactive devs in that list, I wanted other developers opinion before removing anyone though. > git clone worked for me. I also pushed a minor edit to the README file as a test > commit, and that now works, once I fixed lunar-core group :) > > So where is "theedge" located now or is lunar == theedge again ? Is there going > to be a "theedge" branch or what ? lunar (master) == theedge lunar (stable) == lunar At least in my opinion master seem like the sane option to be theedge. When we're happy with the changes on master we merge them to the stable branch. /Stefan > Terry Chan > --------------------------------------------------------- > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Stefan Wold wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I've just converted our lunar core tools repository to git. Access to > > the old svn repository have as of now been revoked. Feel free to test it > > so that it work as intended. Scripts for generating theedge.tar.bz2 and > > lunar.tar.bz2 have been fixed, however lunar.tar.bz2 will be disabled > > for a couple of hours. I need to merge some stuff between master and the > > stable branch before I enable it. All developers who earlier had commit > > access to the core tools should still have that to the new git repo. > > > > Public: git://lunar-linux.org/lunar/lunar.git > > SSH: ssh://lunar-linux.org/var/git/lunar/lunar.git > > > > -- > > Sincerely > > Stefan Wold > > Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 > _______________________________________________ > Lunar-dev mailing list > Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From samuel.verstraete at gmail.com Sun Jun 7 19:55:33 2009 From: samuel.verstraete at gmail.com (samuel) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:55:33 +0200 Subject: [Lunar-commits] unzip: updated to 6.0 In-Reply-To: <20090526002042.429EF9B1EF@doppio.foo-projects.org> References: <20090526002042.429EF9B1EF@doppio.foo-projects.org> Message-ID: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote: > commit 3400291a4aec1068f591ee604de6a83d3b9559d5 > Author: Zbigniew Luszpinski > Date: ? Tue May 26 02:19:07 2009 +0200 > > ? ?unzip: updated to 6.0 doesn't compile on x86_64... error: Check C compiler operation Ok Check C compiler type (optimization options) GNU C ( -O2 -march=x86-64) Check for the C preprocessor Check if we can use asm code Check for ANSI options Check for prototypes Check the handling of const Check for time_t Check for size_t Check for off_t Check for Large File Support off_t is 8 bytes -- yes we have Large File Support! Check for wide char support __STDC_ISO_10646__ = 200009 -- have wchar_t with known UCS encoding - enabling Unicode support! Check for setlocale support (needed for UNICODE Native check) -- have setlocale, can check for charset type -- - enabling UTF8-native support! Check for gcc no-builtin flag Check for fchmod Check for fchown Check for lchown Check for nl_langinfo Check for lchmod Check for memset Check for errno declaration Check for directory libraries Check for readlink Check for directory include file Check for non existent include files Check for term I/O include file Check for MBCS include files Check for MBCS support -- have MBCS support Check for MBCS mbschr Check for MBCS mbsrchr Check for valloc Check for /usr/bin and /usr/man Checking for OS specialties Check for symbolic links Check bzip2 support Check for bzip2 sources in unzip's bzip2 subdirectory -- bzip2 sources not found - no bzip2 support ln: creating hard link `./Makefile': File exists /usr/bin/make objsdll CC=gcc CFLAGS=" -O2 -march=x86-64 -Wall -fPIC"\ LOC="-DDLL -DASM_CRC "\ AS=gcc AF="-fPIC -Di386 " CRCA_O=crc_gcc.o make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/unzip60' gcc -c -O2 -march=x86-64 -Wall -fPIC -I. -Ibzip2 -DUNIX -DDLL -DASM_CRC -o unzip.pic.o unzip.c gcc -c -O2 -march=x86-64 -Wall -fPIC -I. -Ibzip2 -DUNIX -DDLL -DASM_CRC -o crc32.pic.o crc32.c gcc -fPIC -Di386 -x assembler-with-cpp -c -o crc_gcc.pic.o crc_i386.S crc_i386.S: Assembler messages: crc_i386.S:203: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:204: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:205: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:206: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:207: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:208: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' crc_i386.S:292: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' crc_i386.S:293: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' crc_i386.S:294: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' crc_i386.S:295: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' crc_i386.S:296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' crc_i386.S:297: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop' make[1]: *** [crc_gcc.pic.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/unzip60' make: *** [linux_shlib] Error 2 > --- > ?archive/unzip/BUILD ? | ? 15 ++++++++++----- > ?archive/unzip/DETAILS | ? 12 ++++++------ > ?2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/archive/unzip/BUILD b/archive/unzip/BUILD > index 337c9eb..192b791 100644 > --- a/archive/unzip/BUILD > +++ b/archive/unzip/BUILD > @@ -1,9 +1,14 @@ > ?( > > - ?sedit ?"s/-O /$CFLAGS /" ?unix/Makefile > - ?sedit ?"s/MANDIR = \$(prefix)\/man/MANDIR = \$(prefix)\/share\/man/" unix/Makefile > - ?make ?-f unix/Makefile generic ?&& > - ?prepare_install ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && > - ?make ?prefix=/usr -f unix/Makefile install > + ?sedit "s/-O3/$CFLAGS/" unix/configure unix/Makefile && > + ?sedit "s/MANDIR = \$(prefix)\/man/MANDIR = \$(prefix)\/share\/man/" unix/Makefile && > + ?sedit 's@/usr/local@/usr at g' unix/Makefile unix/configure && > + ?cp -rf unix/* . && > + ?./configure && > + ?make linux_shlib && > + ?make linux && > + ?prepare_install && > + ?make install && > + ?cp -af libunzip.s* /usr/lib > > ?) > $C_FIFO 2>&1 > diff --git a/archive/unzip/DETAILS b/archive/unzip/DETAILS > index fa94bd4..031bf44 100644 > --- a/archive/unzip/DETAILS > +++ b/archive/unzip/DETAILS > @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ > ? ? ? ? ? MODULE=unzip > - ? ? ? ? VERSION=5.52 > - ? ? ? ? ?SOURCE=${MODULE}552.tar.gz > + ? ? ? ? VERSION=60 > + ? ? ? ? ?SOURCE=$MODULE$VERSION.tar.gz > +SOURCE_DIRECTORY=$BUILD_DIRECTORY/$MODULE$VERSION > ? ?SOURCE_URL[0]=$SFORGE_URL/infozip/ > - ? SOURCE_URL[1]=ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/src/ > - ? ? ?SOURCE_VFY=sha1:1831bd59b9e607a69052f83b263384895e2d4a19 > + ? ? ?SOURCE_VFY=sha1:abf7de8a4018a983590ed6f5cbd990d4740f8a22 > ? ? ? ? WEB_SITE=http://www.info-zip.org/UnZip.html > ? ? ? ? ?ENTERED=20010922 > - ? ? ? ? UPDATED=20050718 > - ? ? ? ? ? SHORT="PKWARE compatible decompressor." > + ? ? ? ? UPDATED=20090525 > + ? ? ? ? ? SHORT="PKWARE compatible decompressor" > > ?cat << EOF > ?Info-ZIP's purpose is to provide free, portable, high-quality versions > _______________________________________________ > Lunar-commits mailing list > Lunar-commits at lunar-linux.org > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-commits > From zbiggy at o2.pl Sun Jun 7 23:46:42 2009 From: zbiggy at o2.pl (Zbigniew Luszpinski) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:46:42 +0200 Subject: [Lunar-commits] unzip: updated to 6.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20090526002042.429EF9B1EF@doppio.foo-projects.org> Message-ID: <200906072346.42423.zbiggy@o2.pl> On Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 19:55:33 samuel wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Zbigniew > > Luszpinski wrote: > > commit 3400291a4aec1068f591ee604de6a83d3b9559d5 > > Author: Zbigniew Luszpinski > > Date: Tue May 26 02:19:07 2009 +0200 > > > > unzip: updated to 6.0 > > doesn't compile on x86_64... copy unzip module to zlocal and: 1. copy BUILD to BUILD.x86_64 2 modify BUILD.x86_64 by replacing build target from: make linux to: make linux_noasm 3. remove lines: make linux_shlib cp -af libunzip.s* /usr/lib && 4. optional: you may also want to change 1st sedit to change in unix/Makefile: CFLAGS="-O -Wall" to CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wall" 5. optional 2: you may try to modify linux_shlib target to make it working on x64 by removing options: -DASM_CRC AS=gcc -Di386 and if still breaks remove: AF="-fPIC -Di386 $(AF)" have a nice day, Zbigniew 'zbiggy' Luszpinski From ratler at lunar-linux.org Mon Jun 8 18:04:34 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:04:34 +0200 Subject: Test mail. please disregard. Message-ID: <1244477074.4480.17.camel@localhost> -- Sincerely Stefan Wold Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ratler at lunar-linux.org Mon Jun 8 18:12:44 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:12:44 +0200 Subject: Test mail 2, sorry Message-ID: <1244477564.4480.18.camel@localhost> -- Sincerely Stefan Wold Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ratler at lunar-linux.org Mon Jun 8 18:50:10 2009 From: ratler at lunar-linux.org (Stefan Wold) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:50:10 +0200 Subject: lunar-tools and lunar-iso have now been migrated to git as well Message-ID: <1244479810.4480.23.camel@localhost> Hello fellow devs, I have just converted lunar-tools and lunar-iso repositories to git. They can be found here: Public: git://lunar-linux.org/lunar/lunar-tools.git SSH: ssh://lunar-linux.org/var/git/lunar/lunar-tools.git Public: git://lunar-linux.org/lunar/lunar-iso.git SSH: ssh://lunar-linux.org/var/git/lunar/lunar-iso.git People with commit access to the lunar core tools will also have commit access to the above git repos. -- Sincerely Stefan Wold Lunar Linux developer - PGP public key 6E810F05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From engelsman at lunar-linux.org Sat Jun 20 12:48:05 2009 From: engelsman at lunar-linux.org (engelsman at lunar-linux.org) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:48:05 +0200 Subject: openoffice-bin 3.0.1 patch submission for x86_64 Message-ID: <20090620110703.12B93F3DDD@doppio.foo-projects.org> Hi, This mail is to notify you that the "openoffice-bin" module has already been updated in the central moonbase since you submitted the patch for the x86_64 version. Unfortunately none of the Lunar developers with a 64-bit Lunar system had been able to test your 64-bit version. Perhaps you can resubmit a x86_64 version of the latest openoffice-bin-3.1.0 ? Thank you for submitting updates to us! From dennisveatch at bellsouth.net Sat Jun 20 15:34:16 2009 From: dennisveatch at bellsouth.net (Dennis Veatch) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Lunar-commits] Compress-Raw-Zlib: version 2.020 added to moonbase In-Reply-To: <20090620132828.183819B1BE@doppio.foo-projects.org> References: <20090620132828.183819B1BE@doppio.foo-projects.org> Message-ID: <200906200934.16571.dennisveatch@bellsouth.net> On Saturday 20 June 2009 9:25:31 am Duncan Gibson wrote: > commit 0a6383282e8d60b309e6f646acce185f451925c9 > Author: Duncan Gibson > Date: Sat Jun 20 15:25:31 2009 +0200 > > Compress-Raw-Zlib: version 2.020 added to moonbase > > appears to be required to build openoffice-src > --- > 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/BUILD b/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/BUILD > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e69de29 > diff --git a/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/DEPENDS > b/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/DEPENDS new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e69de29 > diff --git a/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/DETAILS > b/perl/Compress-Raw-Zlib/DETAILS new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e69de29 > _______________________________________________ IO-Compress-Zlib does't work? openoffice-src (x86_64) went fine here without Compress-Raw-Zlib -- You can tuna piano but you can't tune a fish. http://www.lunar-linux.org/ It's worth the spin. From duncan.gibson at xs4all.nl Sat Jun 20 15:47:58 2009 From: duncan.gibson at xs4all.nl (Duncan Gibson) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Lunar-commits] Compress-Raw-Zlib: version 2.020 added to moonbase Message-ID: <12881.82.93.24.95.1245505678.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Me: >> Compress-Raw-Zlib: version 2.020 added to moonbase >> appears to be required to build openoffice-src dveatch: > IO-Compress-Zlib does't work? openoffice-src (x86_64) went fine here > without Compress-Raw-Zlib I got an error message during the configure phase about Compress-Zlib version 2.011 not being newer than 2.008 ! and that Compress::Raw::Zlib,pm wasn't found. After adding the Compress-Raw-Zlib module, the next configure succeeded, but I don't quite know yet, it's still building :) D. From zbiggy at o2.pl Sat Jun 27 14:55:37 2009 From: zbiggy at o2.pl (Zbigniew Luszpinski) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:55:37 +0200 Subject: firefox2 module should be removed from moonbase Message-ID: <200906271455.37796.zbiggy@o2.pl> Hello, firefox2 is old and dangerous because it is not security patched anymore. Mozilla abandoned it in favour of firefox 3. I would like to remove firefox2 from moonbase due to security reasons (nobody should use it anymore). 1. If you have any application which uses firefox2 engine you can switch to seamonkey module which uses the same engine like firefox2 (and library files). Only GUI is different. Seamonkey is up to date and secure. 2. If you really have to use firefox2 move it to zlocal so it will be still available for you when it will be removed from moonbase. Tell me if any application requires it - I will try to help you with conversion to firefox 3 or seamonkey. I'm going to remove firefox2 after 30 days since today if Lunar developers will not decide otherwise. have a nice day, Zbigniew Luszpinski From zmcgrew at gmail.com Sat Jun 27 17:42:38 2009 From: zmcgrew at gmail.com (Zachary McGrew) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:42:38 -0700 Subject: firefox2 module should be removed from moonbase In-Reply-To: <200906271455.37796.zbiggy@o2.pl> References: <200906271455.37796.zbiggy@o2.pl> Message-ID: <4b1a641e0906270842p721f5eebv4811fa8cb41bff9@mail.gmail.com> > I'm going to remove firefox2 after 30 days since today if Lunar developers > will not decide otherwise. It's got my vote. And really "%GECKO_RENDERER" should just be replaced with xulrunner at this point too, since Firefox 3 removed the SDK tools portion that Firefox 2 contained. -- Zachary McGrew Web: http://zmcgrew.no-ip.com From auke at foo-projects.org Sat Jun 27 17:43:55 2009 From: auke at foo-projects.org (Auke Kok) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:43:55 -0700 Subject: firefox2 module should be removed from moonbase In-Reply-To: <200906271455.37796.zbiggy@o2.pl> References: <200906271455.37796.zbiggy@o2.pl> Message-ID: <4A463E3B.6070907@foo-projects.org> Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote: > Hello, > > firefox2 is old and dangerous because it is not security patched anymore. > Mozilla abandoned it in favour of firefox 3. I would like to remove firefox2 > from moonbase due to security reasons (nobody should use it anymore). > > 1. If you have any application which uses firefox2 engine you can switch to > seamonkey module which uses the same engine like firefox2 (and library files). > Only GUI is different. Seamonkey is up to date and secure. > > 2. If you really have to use firefox2 move it to zlocal so it will be still > available for you when it will be removed from moonbase. Tell me if any > application requires it - I will try to help you with conversion to firefox 3 > or seamonkey. > > I'm going to remove firefox2 after 30 days since today if Lunar developers > will not decide otherwise. go ahead with this, no need to wait much longer IMO Auke